خرید بک لینک معتبر - سئو - بک لینک -
وان ایکس بت
سایت شرط بندی انفجار
سایت شرط بندی
سایت بازی انفجار
سایت enfejar
جت بت
سایت پیش بینی فوتبال
sibbet90
سایت بازی انفجار
پوکر آنلاین
بت بال 90
انفجار آنلاین
جت بت
بازی انفجار
سایت بازی انفجار
Employment and Criminal lawyer

8 Main Disability Discrimination Questions

8 Main Disability Discrimination Questions

What are the 8 Main Disability Discrimination Questions? California is an at-will employment state. As an at-will employee in California, an individual may be terminated for any reason or no reason at all unless terminated for an illegal reason. Per California Government Code § 12940 an employer's decision to terminate an employee may be characterized as illegal if the reason is based on an employee's religion, race, color, national origin, gender, ancestry, age, military or veteran status, sexual orientation, gender identity, and or disability. Although this is not an exhaustive list, these are considered as protected classes and if an employee belongs to one of these classes and is terminated based on belonging to one of these classes there are remedies available. Specifically, employees with a disability, whether he or she is mentally or physically impaired are protected. In order to make a claim, the employee would need to contact a Disability Discrimination Attorney.
1- What constitutes a physical disability? A physical disability includes a disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, or anatomical loss or health impairment (§ 12926 (m)(1). The disability of this kind must also impact the employee both in a body system and limit a major life activity. Affecting a body system includes but is not limited to special sense organs, neurological, musculoskeletal, reproductive, digestive, and respiratory. The particular system affected would need to limit major life activities socially, physically, mentally, or while working (§ 12926 (m)(1)(B)(iii).
2- Are mental disabilities recognized? Mental disabilities that limit major life activities are considered protected and include mental or psychological conditions, which range from emotional or mental illness to specific learning disabilities (§ 12926 (j)(1)). Mental disabilities that limit major life activities includes the impairment hindering the efficiency and execution of everyday physical, mental, and social functions (ibid). Further details can be provided by a Disability Discrimination Attorney.
3- How does an employee know if they are being discriminated against in the workplace based on their disability? Discrimination within the workplace takes on various forms which may foreshadow an unlawful termination. Forms of discrimination in the workplace are demonstrated through name calling, singling an individual out, passing an individual up for promotion or opportunities, demotion, failing to accommodate a request for reasonable accommodation, involuntary transfer or reassignment, bullying, constructive discharge, and denying benefits. Although not an exhaustive list, discriminatory behavior takes on various forms and is determined on a case by case basis. For further enquirers regarding this type of situation, call a Disability Discrimination Attorney.
4- What is expected of an employer? Pursuant to the California Code of Regulations, title 2, section 11069, the employer should endeavor to facilitate an interactive process between themselves and the employee with a recognized disability. This interactive process is built on open communication between the employer and employee in order to maintain up to date knowledge of the circumstances. By maintaining this interactive process, the employer is on notice and subject to accountability for being aware of the employee's needs for accommodation. In addition, this process promotes the exchange of ideas to reach a set of reasonable accommodations that are appropriate for the individual.
5- What kind of accommodation should an employer provide? An employer should provide reasonable accommodation. Reasonable accommodation provided to an employee entails adjustments and modifications of the employee's position that enables the employee to have an equal opportunity as their peers to carry out tasks. Some circumstances may require the employer to suggest transferring the employee to a more practicable position, ensuring the job-site facilities are accessible to the employee, permitting a service animal to accompany the employee at work, supplying the employee with a reader or interpreter, providing a modified schedule as well as part-time work, providing accommodation for training or tests or additional training, and providing any other reasonable modifications to the employee's work-site and or environment. For more clarification on what kind of accommodation should be provided, ask a Disability Discrimination Attorney.
6- What does it mean to be retaliated against? Once an employee makes a complaint against their employer or against any practice within the organization regarding their recognized disability, the employee could be mistreated by means of retaliation. This situation arises when the employee makes a complaint against certain unlawful practices that violate FEHA regulations being conducted within the workplace. In response to the complaint(s), the employer or organization takes adverse employment action against the employee. For example, an employee with a hearing impairment makes a formal complaint to their human resources department regarding his or her supervisor refusing to hire a sign language interpreter for a required training seminar. Shortly after the complaint is made, the employee is demoted to a lower paying position that does not require attending the training session. Here, the organization's response to the complaint may be characterized as discriminatory and retaliatory based on the employee's protest against their supervisor's refusal to provide reasonable accommodation.
Even if the employee's specific request for accommodation is not granted, the employee is still under the protection of FEHA in that they can both be discriminated or retaliated against for making the request in the first place. Such circumstances need to be evaluated by a Disability Discrimination Attorney.
7- What is considered unlawful employment practices? If an employee falls under one of the recognized protected classes, specifically in this case the employee possesses a physical or mental disability, and an employer mistreats the employee based on having a disability may be considered unlawful. The FEHA and California Government Code § 12940(a) qualify unlawful treatment as being demonstrated through hiring practices, path to promotion selection, distribution of work benefits and privileges or compensation.
As previously mentioned, an employer is required to provide reasonable accommodation for an employee with a recognized disability. It is considered unlawful under FEHA for an employer to refuse to implement reasonable accommodation(s) requested by the employee as well as not consider recommendations made by the employee's licensed physician. Also, for further assistance on the matter, discuss the matter with a local Disability Discrimination Attorney.
8- How to prove an employee has an action in disability discrimination against their employer? There must be a direct link between the employee's disability and the reason for termination. In other words, the employee must prove that they were fired based on their recognized disability. For example, an employee is diagnosed with a condition in which their vision is significantly impaired and shortly after their employer is put on notice of this, the employee is let go from their position "because they can't see". This would demonstrate a causal link between the employee's disability and the decision to terminate. Alternatively, the employee may need to prove that the connection between the disability and the termination was demonstrated through unequal treatment or failure to make adjustments or modifications were necessary to do so.
If an employee wants to know if they have a case concerning these issues they need to reach out to a Disability Discrimination Attorney.

Top 6 Tips For Hiring The Right Employment Lawyer

Top 6 Tips For Hiring The Right Employment Lawyer


Top 6 Tips for Hiring the Right Employment Lawyer

Do you know what is the top 6 tips for hiring the right employment lawyer? Deciding to pursue a lawsuit can be a serious decision within itself but choosing who will represent you in your suit is an even greater choice. Employment law issues are usually handled in civil law. This factor merely narrows your search to lawyers who practice civil litigation. Where do you go from there? So many factors need to be taken into account in choosing an Employment Lawyer. Any firm or Employment Lawyer can put together a website but having a website is not the telltale sign of a good lawyer. Below are some points to consider in your search for legal counsel.

Top 6 Tips For Hiring The Right Employment Lawyer


  1. Who's side are you on

Although there are many candidates in choosing an Employment Lawyer, it is imperative to select an Employment Lawyer who is best suited for your particular case. Firstly, you need to find out if your case is actually an employment case, meaning the issue pertains to something that happened at work or between you and your employer. Secondly, you need to figure out whether you need a defense lawyer on the employer side or a lawyer who represents employees on the plaintiff side. So if you are an employee, who needs representation in a claim against your employer, you will need an Employment Lawyer who works on the plaintiff side. If you are being sued by an employee you will need a defense lawyer.

Top 6 Tips For Hiring The Right Employment Lawyer

  1. This ain't my first rodeo

What is the nature of your case? The lawyer you choose needs to have experience in your particular claim. Employment law firms focus on certain areas of employment law. Some firms consider themselves a general practice. Other law firms have handled more cases in a particular area of employment law than other firms. Taking all of this into account, it is in your best interest to find an Employment Lawyer who has had experience as well as success in cases similar to your situation. For example, if you are being sexually harassed at work you should seek an Employment Lawyer who focuses on sexual harassment cases. If you are of a certain race and you feel that your boss picks on you and writes you up for bogus reasons because he does not care for your race, then you want to look for an Employment Lawyer who has handled many cases in discrimination law. Alternatively, you may need a wrongful termination lawyer if you reported illegal activity like patient abuse but as a result, your employer fired you from your job. There are also employment lawyers who exclusively fixate on wage claims which have to do with employee payment. Some lawyers have experience in leave of absence cases such as employees who take a leave due to a severe illness.

The laws that regulate employment law are vast, therefore you need to find a lawyer who has handled cases in the past that are similar to your case.

Top 6 Tips For Hiring The Right Employment Lawyer

  1. Get a free consultation

Because you are searching for the right lawyer for you, you should seek out firms and/or an Employment Lawyer who offers a free consultation. This means you get to go into the firm and have a sit-down with an actual lawyer to discuss the facts of your case without any fees attached to the service. This allows the lawyer to examine your unique circumstances and tell you whether or not he or she is confident you have a case. In addition, this face-to-face will allow you to decide whether you even want this particular firm or lawyer to handle your case. Lastly, visiting multiple firms that offer a free consultation will allow you to make a more educated decision on what firm you should choose.

Top 6 Tips For Hiring The Right Employment Lawyer

  1. Get more bang for your buck

No recovery no fee! Some employment law firms or employment lawyers offer a contingency fee for their service. This means that the Employment Lawyer will only charge the client if they win or settle the case. Firms that run their practice this way are diligent in their work for their client and will usually take on cases that they are confident about. This provides some security for you as the client in that you won't feel you are being taken advantage of in billable hours. Also, employment law firms that offer a contingency fee for their services recognize that some potential clients may not have the financial stability to hire an attorney but their rights as an employee in California have been violated and are entitled to representation.

If you are unsure if a firm offers no up-front fees, call and ask if the firm takes cases on a contingency base before you agree to come into the law office.

Top 6 Tips For Hiring The Right Employment Lawyer

  1. Are they a litigation practice?


Even if a law firm ticks a few boxes on your list, you should still be wary in that the firm may not be willing to take your case to trial. In employment law, not all cases go to trial, they settle. But if a case does not settle, the next step would be to go to trial and not all employment lawyers or firms are willing to provide this service, leaving your case unresolved. In order to avoid this from happening, before signing a retainer agreement you should ask the lawyer you are considering whether or not they are willing to go to trial if the case does not settle.

The legal representation in which you select needs to be committed to taking the case to trial if down the line it does not settle. This will help you to not waste your time with a lawyer who will leave your case unresolved and you having to hire new representation.

Top 6 Tips For Hiring The Right Employment Lawyer

  1. Don't be an eager beaver


As mentioned previously, deciding to pursue legal proceedings is not a trivial choice. Deciding to take legal action against a company or employer is a commitment for you as a client and a commitment for the lawyer whom you choose to hire to represent you. That being said, do not be eager to sign a retainer agreement online. Some firms may ask you to sign a retainer agreement online and with that there are risks. Signing a retainer online will deprive you as the client from having the facts of your case carefully considered by a lawyer.

8 Things You Need To Know About Disability Discrimination



8 Things You Need To Know About Disability Discrimination

1- At the Federal and State level, discrimination against employees with disabilities is prohibited by law. Under the Federal law, the Americans with Disability Act (ADA) prohibits discriminatory actions taken by employers against their employees. The same applies at the State level in California and is regulated by the Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). Amongst other recognized protected classes and or characteristics, employees with physical or mental disabilities have rights that protect them from being discriminated against based on their disability. Employees with disabilities in California have many rights under FEHA, however it is a matter of knowing your rights as a disabled employee in order to know you have a claim against your employer or organization who has violated those rights. Call a Disability Discrimination Lawyer to discuss this further.
2- An employee may have a disability discrimination case if they can show that they had a recognized disability, they possessed the skills and qualifications for the position they occupied at the time or applied for, they were subjected to adverse treatment in the workplace, and the reason for this treatment was based on their recognized disability. A Disability Discrimination Lawyer in your area is the professional to contact in this kind of situation,
3- Recognized mental disabilities under FEHA may include mental or psychological disorders such as learning disabilities, associated deficits and disorders, intellectual disabilities, organic brain syndrome, and/or emotional or mental illness. A recognized physical disability under FEHA may include any physical impairment by a physiological disease, disorder, condition, cosmetic disfigurement, or any loss of control of the body. Physical impairments must affect the employee's body system as well as limit major life activity. Consider speaking to a Disability Discrimination Lawyer for more assistance.
4- The burden of proof is on the plaintiff, in this case, the employee, to prove that he or she has been discriminated against by the employer. In order to prove an employee has been discriminated against, the employee must prove that there was a causal connection between their disability and their termination, constructive termination or resignation from their position. This causal connection would demonstrate that the employee was terminated based on their disability. For example, an employee with a recognized learning disability is asked to sit for an exam for training purposes. This employee's particular disability required that he have a person read the exam directions and questions aloud to him. When the employee sent a formal request for this accommodation, the employer said they had to let him go because "this company didn't need the dead weight of someone who couldn't handle taking an exam without having someone read the instructions for them". Here, the employer's actions and words may be characterized as discriminatory because the employee's request for accommodation triggered the employer's decision to terminate his employment (Hoffman v. Caterpillar, Inc., 368 F. 3d 709, 2004 U.S. App.) Therefore, there is a direct causal link between the employee's disability and the decision to terminate. In this scenario the employee would be able to draw this link and have a potential action against the employer for disability discrimination under FEHA. For a clearer understanding of this contact a Disability Discrimination Lawyer.
5- If the case was to go to trial, the employee in this scenario would have to show that their disability was the substantial and driving force behind the termination.(Horsford v. Board of Trustees of Calif. State Univ. (2005)) Referring back to the employee with the learning disability, let's say prior to the employee's request for accommodation he had been caught stealing products from his job-site. Based on those facts the employer may argue that the reason for firing the employee was based on the theft. Therefore, the employee may not be able to prove that his disability was the substantial cause of his termination. Asking a Disability Discrimination Lawyer is the best way to pursue a disability discrimination case.
6- As mentioned previously, an employer's choice of words can be calculated to being discriminatory and contribute to the evidence that the employee was wrongfully terminated. An employer may choose to verbalize, or write words or make remarks that may be discriminatory. This could occur anywhere from being said in an email or in passing in the break room. In some circumstances the remark could be characterized as discriminatory even if the remark was not directed at the employee with a disability (Metoyer v. Chassman (9th 2007)) For example, referring the employee with the learning disability, prior to his termination his employer may have made jokes at the company Christmas party to other employees about "how lazy people with disabilities are". Here, even though this comment was made to another employee, the employee with the disability may present this as evidence that their disability was the ultimate cause of his termination. However, keep in mind that it bolsters an employee's claim if the remarks made by the employer were related to the ultimate decision to terminate the employee otherwise they may be considered "stray remarks" (Waterhouse v. Hopkins (1989)). In California, "stray remarks", which may be discriminatory remarks made outside of the decision-process to terminate an employee, are still taken into account and considered part of all evidence as a whole (Reid v. Google, Inc. (2010)). With the assistance of a Disability Discrimination Lawyer, an employee can make claim against their former employer.
7- An employee may strengthen their claim if they can prove that their employer did not implement the reasonable accommodation. Depending on the circumstances and the particular disability, in general, an employer would need to reasonably accommodate an employee through modifications and adjustments, facilitate processes that would enable the employee to carry out essential job functions, and provide paid or unpaid leave to the employee while they receive treatment for their disability. Some ways that an employer could accommodate the disabled employee would be by allowing the employee to switch to a part-time position, allow flexibility in scheduling, adjust facilities within the workplace to be accessible to the employee based on the employee's disability needs, provide extra training to ensure the employee receives an equal opportunity in comparison to all other employees, allow the employee to have support or guide dog accompany them at work,

8- Above all, it is imperative that the employer maintains open communication with the employee in relation to any changes in their needs as a disabled employee, also known as an "interactive process". It is the organization or employer's responsibility to ensure that all supervisors who oversee the disabled employee are aware of any accommodations that need to be provided to the employee. For further guidance on the matter, call a Disability Discrimination Lawyer.

How to Deal With Sexual Harassment Outside of The Workplace

How to deal with sexual harassment outside of the workplace

How to deal with sexual harassment outside of the workplace? It is well-settled law in California under the Fair Employment and Housing Act as well as the California Government Code § 12940(k) that an employer owes a duty to their employees to prevent harassment within the workplace. But what if an employee is sexually harassed off-site yet within a work capacity? This may be a situation where an employee is not at work but he or she is carrying out tasks or participating in functions that are work-related. More importantly, are employees the only individuals who are covered by the law in this area? What about applicants? In a heavily populated State such as California, the job market can be fierce and highly competitive, making it difficult for job-seekers to get their foot in the door. As a result, these applicants seeking jobs are vulnerable to illegal hiring processes which promote discrimination and sexual harassment. In these situations, employers are liable for the acts of their own employees who posses hiring power and abuse this power. When issues such as these arise, reaching out to a local Sexual Harassment Attorney is the best way to find out if further legal action should be taken.
An employer or organization is responsible for and held accountable for the acts of their employees whom they have delegated hiring power to within the workplace. The Court in the case Doe v Capitol Cities, 50, Cal. App. 4th 1038 had to address this issue of just how far an employer's liability extends in these "off-site" situations. In that case, the plaintiff was an actor who was applying, or rather auditioning for a role which took place on a Sunday at the casting director's home. During this encounter, the plaintiff alleged that he was drugged and gang raped by the casting director as well as four other men. The plaintiff brought an action against the employer of the company, inter alia, for violating the California Government Code § 12940 (h). Under that regulation, it is illegal for an employer or organization to retaliate against an applicant or employee because the applicant or employee made a complaint against the employer or organization for unlawful practices. The action was brought against the employer who oversaw the casting director because it was ultimately the employer's responsibility to ensure that the workplace was harassment-free. In this case, the Court of Appeal decided that the plaintiff did have a case if he could provide evidence that his allegations were true, then as a result, strict liability would be placed upon the employer. This meant that the plaintiff in this case only had to prove that the acts actually took place and that the employer was responsible for the casting director's acts, and it did not matter what the employer knew or was supposed to have known about the casting director's tendencies. Today, if an employee was in a similar situation when attempting to apply for a position and was subjected to such treatment, they should reach out to a Sexual Harassment Attorney to discuss their case.
But how could the employer be held liable for what happened at the casting director's home and on a Sunday? The Court reviewed the facts and evidence of the case and was able to conclude that the casting director was acting within his capacity as an employee because he was locating, discovering, training, and acquiring actors, just as he did to the plaintiff. Therefore, even though the incident did not occur at the actual work-site, nevertheless the casting director was acting as an agent for his boss. Importantly, the Court did take into account that the incident took place off-site, and it also occurred outside of work hours. However, the Court found that because the casting director's acts were so closely related to his position of employment that it did not absolve the employer of responsibility. Lastly, it is significant to take note that the plaintiff, in this case, was not an actual employee of the company when the incident took place. The court also took this into account that the plaintiff was not an applicant yet decided that this did not matter and the employer of the company remained liable for the casting director's behavior. This was because the plaintiff was in pursuit of employment which placed both the plaintiff and the casting director in a work-related context.

Here in California, under the Fair Employment and Housing Act, an employer's liability for sexual harassment extends to managers, supervisors, and controllers who foster a hostile work environment. Per Title VII, a manager is seen as acting for the employer when generating this hostile work environment, therefore the employer can be held vicariously liable. Under the California Government Code § 12926(t) and the Fair Employment and Housing Act, the definition of "supervisor" is much broader and considers this title to be anyone who has hiring power, a power to transfer an employee, fire an employee, demote an employee, or even a power to reward an employee.


Liability at the federal level is slightly different. In a particular federal case, an employee was a lifeguard and employed by the city. She brought a suit against her employer because she felt that she was being subjected to a sexually charged as well as hostile work environment which was created by her supervisors. The environment at issue was considered hostile because the supervisors were causing the particular employee and other employees to experience unwanted touching. Here the employee made a claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act 1964, 42 U.S.C.S. § 2000e et seq for these acts and the environment imposed on her as an employee. The Court, in this case, found that the employee who brought the action had a claim against her employer by extending the employer's liability to cover the supervisor's acts Faragher v City of Boca Raton (1998) 524 US 775, 807, 118 S. Ct. 2275, 2292-2293. A Sexual Harassment Attorney would be able to evaluate an employee's case for free if they have a similar problem at work and may be able to file suit against the company.

What’s Happening With Sexual Orientation Discrimination In The Workplace?


What’s Happening With Sexual Orientation Discrimination In The Workplace?

What's Happening With Sexual Orientation Discrimination In The Workplace?
An Employment Lawyer is an attorney who may represent an employee against their employer in a situation where he or she was treated poorly at work based on their sexual orientation. But what is sexual orientation harassment? What is discrimination against a person's sexual orientation? In order to understand the answers to these questions, it may make more sense to start with the laws that surround these topics and to know who is protected by these laws.
What is discrimination and harassment?
What exactly does it mean to be discriminated against in the workplace? To discriminate is to notice an individual's differences from others and to treat that individual differently from others in a negative way because of that individual's differences. There are employment laws in place that regulate discriminatory practices within the workplace and deem them as unlawful.
Not all forms of discrimination are unlawful in the workplace. For example, it may seem unfair but employees who are over a certain weight may not be a class of individuals who are protected under the law. For instance, if an employee is overweight and is picked on and treated adversely compared to other employees based on being overweight, while It is unkind it may not be considered as unlawful. Employment laws only recognize certain classes of individuals and particular characteristics as being protected. Examples of classes and characteristics that are recognized by the law are an employee's creed, religion, marital status, gender, age, military status, ethnicity, disability, medical condition, veteran status, and sexual orientation. If an employee is singled out and treated negatively based on belonging to one of the recognized classes or an employee is treated poorly based on possessing an acknowledged characteristic, then that may be considered as an unlawful treatment.
Where an employee is treated differently compared to other employees in a negative way and it is because that employee falls under a protected class or bears a recognized characteristic, that employee may have a case against their employer for discrimination. An employer or organization may be held liable for discrimination if the employee can show he or she was singled out based on a protected class or characteristic. It is essential to note that belonging to a protected class or bearing a guarded characteristic does not mean that an employee is automatically granted a right to sue for discrimination and/or wrongful termination. This means that if the unfair treatment is not based on the employee being a member of a protected class or bearing a protected characteristic then it not considered discrimination. For example, George was a 50-year-old man at an online store's warehouse. The law does recognize age as a protected class for employees who are 40 years of age and older. Recently George was fired for being late several times and was caught falsifying his time sheets. In this scenario, although George may qualify as being a person belonging to a protected class, which in this case would be age, he may not be able to prove he was a victim of age discrimination. In George's case, his employer may be able to claim that he was fired because of George's tardiness and fraudulent acts. The adverse treatment needs to be based on the employee belonging to a protected class or bearing a protected characteristic whereas here, George was not exactly Employee of the Month material. George's termination would need to show that it was based on his age. So if George had been told by his boss "hey, you're getting too old for this job" and then thereafter he was terminated, that may be considered as age discrimination.
Discrimination in its application is handled by an Employment Lawyer who represents employees against their employers. In order to even know if you or someone you know has been discriminated against, you should contact an Employment Lawyer in your area.
Harassment in the workplace can come in the form of teasing, name-calling, talking down to an employee, mocking, berating, or bullying. Another form of harassment may be delivered through photos, videos, memes, cartoons, emails, texts, and physical gestures. All of these forms of harassment are categorized as unlawful once the harassment is motivated by the singling out of a protected class. More specifically, if the harassment is based on an employee's sexual orientation, that may be considered as unlawful.
Discrimination and harassment against sexual orientation
Discrimination and/or harassment against an employee's sexual orientation is considered as unlawful behavior because sexual orientation is considered protected by certain employment laws. Sexual orientation refers to an individual's sexual or romantic preference such as homosexuality, heterosexuality, and bisexuality. If an employee is singled out, treated adversely, or treated less favorable compared to all other employees because of his or her sexual orientation, then that may be discrimination or harassment. An employee who is being discriminated against based on his or her sexual orientation may experience being denied employee benefits, being passed over for promotion, reduced pay, reduced hours, or termination. An applicant may also be subjected to unlawful hiring practices which also prohibited by the employment laws.
The laws in employment law hold employers accountable for discrimination even for perceived sexual orientation harassment and/or discrimination. In other words, an employee who is assumed by their employer or fellow coworkers as being homosexual and is not, yet is teased and harassed based on that assumption, may still be held liable for harassment and/or discrimination.
An Employment Lawyer who has handled cases in the past in sexual orientation discrimination and harassment may know the best way to represent an employee who is in a current discrimination or harassment situation at work.
An employee should not have to endure harassment or discrimination if it is based on a protected class or characteristic, especially if the harassment and/or discrimination is based on an employee's sexual orientation. Employees have the right to feel safe in their work environment and employers are responsible for enforcing an anti-discrimination policy at the workplace. The current employment laws are in place to provide protection for employees and they will be enforced if an Employment Lawyer is hired by an employee who is being victimized at work.

What is religious Discrimination and Accommodation?

What is religious Discrimination and Accommodation?
What is religious Discrimination and Accommodation?
People in America have the right to practice the religion of their choice. But what happens when you try to exercise some of your religious practices at work and your boss does not like it?
  • What if you need to wear a certain type of clothing due to your religious beliefs and you are punished by your employer?
  • What rights do employees have at work when it comes to their religion?
  • Are all types of religious beliefs recognized by the law?
  • What type of lawyer handles religion discrimination in the workplace?
  • Can I sue my boss for telling me I cannot participate in my religious practices at work? Is religion considered a protected class?
  • How do I know if my boss has provided the correct accommodation for my religious related request?
Who and what is protected?
There are laws that pertain specifically to employment law that deem the denial of accommodation for religious purposes to be considered discriminatory. In some employment situations, if an employee makes a request for accommodation regarding their religion and it is denied, that employee may be entitled to sue their employer for discrimination.
Employers are required by certain laws to provide reasonable accommodation to an employee who makes a request for accommodation regarding their religion. The employer is expected to make reasonable accommodation for employees who make a request that has to do with their religious beliefs, religious beliefs that are affiliated with common religions which include rituals, ceremonies, celebrations, customs, and/or practices. For example, some employees may observe Ramadan in which the employee may fast.
"Religion" in employment law means that employers must recognize any religions and/or "religious creeds". Employers technically must recognize an employee's religious system or faith, and the traditions and practices in which the employee exercises for religious purposes. This includes moral, social, and behavior beliefs that are upheld by common religious systems.
A Discrimination Lawyer is the best type of legal professional to consult on employment matters regarding religion and employee rights. Should an employee have any issues regarding their employee rights, they should contact a Discrimination Lawyer for a free consultation.
Being punished just for asking
Aside from even having a request granted/accommodated, an employee who even puts in a request to their employer or Human Resources Department is protected from discrimination. This means that the law recognizes that an employee has a right to make a request for accommodation in regards to their religion without being retaliated against or treated adversely because of their request for accommodation. If an employee is in fact punished for making a request for accommodation because of their religion, an employee may have the right to take legal action against their employer for discrimination and/or retaliation.
There are many ways in which an employee may find themselves being punished for asking for accommodation at work in order to practice their religion. A Discrimination Lawyer is the kind of lawyer who would be able to determine if an employee was in fact punished by their employer for making a request.
How does an employer retaliate?
Retaliation against an employee by their employer is prohibited by law in certain circumstances. If an employee makes a request for accommodation for their religion and thereafter they are treated adversely by their employer directly or indirectly, it may be considered as retaliation.
An employer may retaliate against an employee after he or she makes an accommodation request to their employer or Human Resources department because of their religion. The retaliation may be identified by the employer's actions and/or behavior such as reducing the employee's hours, reducing the employees pay, denying the employee employment benefits, confiscating employee benefits from the employee, and/or choosing other employees over the particular employee for promotion. An employer may also retaliate against an employee who makes a request for accommodation for a religious purpose by making rude comments towards the employee, singling the employee out, name-calling or even reprimanding the employee for bogus reasons.
An example of retaliation would be if an employee's religion called for wearing a clothing that covered his or her face. The employee may make a request to their employer to permit them to wear this type of clothing to work for religious purposes. After the employee made the request the employer may begin treating the employee poorly such as reducing their shifts or giving the employee shifts that the employer knows would cause the employee hardship. In this example, the timeline shows that the employee put in the request followed by being treated poorly. This may imply that the employee was being punished for making the request which is prohibited by law. The employee in this example may have a claim against their employer for retaliation as well as discrimination. In order to carry out this claim, he or she should contact a Discrimination Lawyer to discuss their employee rights.
The test
As an employee who needs to make a request for accommodation or has made a request for accommodation regarding religious beliefs, there is a test that the law uses to determine whether the employer must recognize the employee's particular religion and/or practice. Firstly, the employee's religion must address issues and answer questions relating to the meaning of life, death, and the performance of faith. Secondly, the employee's religion must be all-inclusive in essence, having an actual belief system rather than a secluded form of teaching. Lastly, the employee's religion can be identified by the existence of visible and explicit signs, which for example being a vegetarian would not be recognized.

Last words
So what is religious discrimination and accommodation? Although the above information may somewhat answer this question, it is always best to discuss your employee rights with a Discrimination Lawyer. Each case varies and differs on the facts, therefore a one-on-one with a Discrimination Lawyer is the most efficient way to decide whether you should pursue the matter in a court of law. Make sure to reach out to a Discrimination Lawyer who offers free consultations to potential clients which include no other up-front costs.

Do I need to provide a doctor’s note to verify the need for a medical leave of absence?

Do I need to provide a doctor’s note to verify the need for a medical leave of absence?

Do I need to provide a doctor's note to verify the need for a medical leave of absence?

Taking a medical leave of absence is not ideal for an employee or their employer, but it happens. The law recognizes that sometimes things happen in an employee's life that they have little or no control over which is why there are legal standards that both employees and employers need to meet in order to comply with the applicable laws. Although employees do have rights when it comes to a medical leave of absence for certain reasons, the laws are indeed perplexing. As a result, some employees may find it difficult to even know what rights they have. Hiring an Employment Lawyer or a Labor Attorney would be the type of legal professional an employee should contact to discuss their rights and obtain advice from based on their particular situation.
There are federal and state statutes that regulate leaves of absence and/or affect the rights of employees who take a leave of absence. Although there are federal and state statutes that regulate leaves of absence, the good news is that an employee may utilize the applicable body of law that provides the most protection in their particular situation, which an Employment Lawyer or Labor Attorney will be able to determine. Below are a few points to keep in mind in regards to taking a medical leave of absence.
Who can take a leave of absence?
In most cases, an employee can take a protected leave of absence if they have what a doctor considers as a "serious health condition" such as an illness or injury. An employee may also have a protected leave if their spouse, child, or parent is diagnosed with a "serious health condition." Alternatively, an employee may take a protected leave for the birth of their child as well as to care for the child thereafter. Also, an employee may be entitled to a protected leave of absence for the placement of an adopted child.
Lastly, an employee may be protected in taking a leave of absence if he or she has a family member who is on active duty or in the armed forces.
Am I entitled to paid leave?
An employee is not usually entitled to a paid leave. In some cases however, an employee may be entitled to a paid leave if there is a policy in place at their particular company that ensures that the employee does receive paid leave. Each employee's circumstances differ so it is important to discuss the particulars of your case in deciding whether or not you were or are entitled to paid leave.
Do I need to provide a doctor's note to verify the need for a medical leave of absence?
In a situation where you need to take a medical leave from work, whether or not you need to provide a note from your doctor is a complicated question. Typically, if an employer requests a doctor's note, then an employee may be obligated to provide one from their doctor. Not providing a doctor's note may give the employer the right to deny the employee's request for a leave of absence.
If an employee does put in a request to their employer to take a medical leave of absence, the employer may give the employee a series of forms for their doctor to complete within a specific time frame. An employee who is given documents by their employer should have the paperwork filled out as soon as possible by their doctor and returned to their employer within the time frame specified by the employer. It will be helpful for the employee to keep a copy of all written communications with the employer and all documents related to the leave, as well as keeping a record of all verbal communications between themselves and their employer.
Is my boss required to give me my same job back?
A common concern that many employees have before, during, or after they take a medical leave is whether or not they will be reinstated upon their return. Depending on the specific facts and circumstances of the case, an employee may be entitled to reinstatement upon their return. An employee may have a right to reinstatement is if he or she has a "serious health issue" according to a doctor. In addition to having a serious health issue, the employee would need to have taken no more than 12 weeks of leave. This means that if a doctor diagnoses an employee with a serious health issue and the doctor advises in a form to the employee's employer that the employee needs a certain amount of time off, it would need to be no more than 12 weeks in order for the employee to be entitled to return to their same/equivalent position.
For example, after a recent visit to her doctor, Beth was diagnosed with a serious illness which required that she have surgery within the month. Her doctor informed Beth that after the surgery she would need to be on bed rest for at least 2-3 weeks. Beth is an assistant manager at the factory she is employed at and is now worried that if she takes time off for the surgery she will lose her job. Here, Beth is in a difficult position because she needs to take time off of work to address her medical condition and secondly, she is worried that she is going to lose her job or perhaps be demoted if she does follow her doctor's instructions to take time off. In Beth's case, she may be entitled to her same job upon her return. This is because Beth's doctor has recommended that she take 2-3 weeks off which placed Beth below the 12-week cut-off. Therefore Beth may not have an issue being reinstated upon her return.
Every case varies due to the complexity of the laws that regulate leaves of absence for employees. Certain factors may be taken into consideration in deciding whether or not you may obtain your original position such as how essential your position was at the company. If you are an employee and have questions related to a leave of absence, you should reach out to a Labor Attorney to discuss whether any of your rights were violated and if your employer complied with the leave of absence laws.

Can my employer ask about my race?

Can my employer ask about my race
Can my employer ask about my race?

Can an employer ask an employee or an applicant about their race? The short answer is technically no. In some states, it is legal for an employer to inquire about an employee or an applicant's race. California is one of the few states in America that prohibits race-based affirmative action. This means that an employer is not permitted by the law to ask an employee or an applicant what their race is in order to decide whether to provide employment opportunities or not to a particular individual. A Discrimination Attorney in California may be able to provide legal advice to an employee or applicant if he or she was discriminated against based on their race. Below there are some points to consider when dealing with race discrimination in the workplace.
What is race discrimination?
Discrimination laws, in general, were enacted to create equality in the workplace. The laws are meant to prevent employees that belong to a protected class or bear a protected characteristic from being discriminated against because of their differences. The race is considered protected under the law.
Race discrimination in the workplace is where an employee is treated differently from other employees in a negative way based on the employee's race. Race pertains to an employee's ethnicity or ancestry. These laws that prohibit race discrimination do not only apply to long-established groups of minorities, but to all groups of employees and applicants. In other words, the laws are to protect "race" and "color" in general and is not meant to only protect certain groups exclusively. Although race and color may coincide and appear to be interchangeable concepts, the law identifies them as separate claims in a discrimination case. In federal court, the laws that regulate race discrimination identify employment decisions based on stereotypes to be unlawful. For example, an employer who refused to hire an applicant based on the fact that the employee was born and raised in Mexico and based on the assumption that "all Mexicans are lazy" would be considered under federal laws as race discrimination.
Examples of race discrimination would include name-calling, teasing, ostracizing an employee, denying the employee benefits, reducing the employee's pay, deducting the employee's work hours, reprimanding the employee for bogus reasons, or termination. An applicant who is denied employment based on their race is also considered race discrimination and an applicant may be entitled to recovery in that situation.
Another example of racial discrimination may be if an employer requires that all employees only speak English while at work. In other circumstances, an employer may be found liable for race discrimination if he or she makes a decision about whether to hire someone or not based on the applicant's accent. The only way an employer may negative liability for not hiring an applicant based on the applicant's accent is if the accent substantially interferes with the main roles of the position.
Going back to the original question of whether an employer can ask about an employee's race, if an employer were to do that, it would be considered as race discrimination. Race should not be considered when hiring an employee as this does not make employment opportunities equal to all individuals. Keep in mind that all cases depend on the circumstances and would need to be determined on a case by case basis. In order to ultimately determine if an employee or an applicant should take legal action, he or she should seek advice from a Discrimination Attorney.
Taking legal action
First and foremost, in order to begin legal proceedings, an employee or applicant must first confirm whether or not he or she even has a claim. The way in which an employee or applicant can confirm whether he or she has a claim against an employer or organization is by consulting a Discrimination Attorney. A Discrimination Attorney is a type of legal professional who handles cases where an employee or applicant may need legal representation against an employer or organization. A Discrimination Attorney is the type of lawyer who can look over a set of facts and the surrounding circumstances to determine whether an employee or applicant has a claim of discrimination.
Once an employee or applicant arranges a free consultation with a Discrimination Attorney, the attorney may ask certain questions such as how long was the employee employed at their job, when did the discrimination begin, why did he or she feel they were being discriminated against, how many employees are at the company, have any other employees be discriminated against and how, has this particular employee made a formal complaint, have any other employees made a complaint, and specific details on how and why the employee felt as though he or she was discriminated against. By collecting these details, the Discrimination Attorney can advise the employee or applicant on whether he or she should continue in pursuing a claim of discrimination.
Anti-discrimination laws and policies have expanded and matured over the years through the establishment of state and federal statutes. An employee can find what their rights are and what laws are in place that prohibits discrimination under California's Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Depending on the circumstances an employee or applicant may have the choice of either filing their suit under either the Fair Employment and Housing Act or Title VII. This is also a decision to discuss with a Discrimination Attorney.

Taking legal action against an employer or organization is a hefty decision to make but by having a face-to-face meeting with a Discrimination Attorney, an employee or applicant can have a more educated decision in deciding to proceed. Plus, there are firms that offer free consultations which provide employees or applicants with the freedom to explore their legal options without paying any up-front costs. Again, in California, it is considered race discrimination for an employer to ask an employee or applicant about their race and it is unlawful for an employer to treat an employee adversely based on his or her race.

What is sexual orientation harassment or discrimination?

What is sexual orientation harassment or discrimination?
What is sexual orientation harassment or discrimination?

An Employment Lawyer is an attorney who may represent an employee against their employer in a situation where he or she was treated poorly at work based on their sexual orientation. But what is sexual orientation harassment? What is discrimination against a person's sexual orientation? In order to understand the answers to these questions, it may make more sense to start with the laws that surround these topics and to know who is protected by these laws.

What is discrimination and harassment?

What exactly does it mean to be discriminated against in the workplace? To discriminate is to notice an individual's differences from others and to treat that individual differently from others in a negative way because of that individual's differences. There are employment laws in place that regulate discriminatory practices within the workplace and deem them as unlawful.

Not all forms of discrimination are unlawful in the workplace. For example, it may seem unfair but employees who are over a certain weight may not be a class of individuals who are protected under the law. For instance, if an employee is overweight and is picked on and treated adversely compared to other employees based on being overweight, while It is unkind it may not be considered as unlawful. Employment laws only recognize certain classes of individuals and particular characteristics as being protected. Examples of classes and characteristics that are recognized by the law are an employee's creed, religion, marital status, gender, age, military status, ethnicity, disability, medical condition, veteran status, and sexual orientation. If an employee is singled out and treated negatively based on belonging to one of the recognized classes or an employee is treated poorly based on possessing an acknowledged characteristic, then that may be considered asunlawful treatment.

Where an employee is treated differently compared to other employees in a negative way and it is because that employee falls under a protected class or bears a recognized characteristic, that employee may have a case against their employer for discrimination. An employer or organization may be held liable for discrimination if the employee can show he or she was singled out based on a protected class or characteristic. It is essential to note that belonging to a protected class or bearing a guarded characteristic does not mean that an employee is automatically granted a right to sue for discrimination and/orwrongful termination. This means that if the unfair treatment is not based on the employee being a member of a protected class or bearing a protected characteristic then it not considered discrimination. For example, George was a 50-year-old man at an online store's warehouse. The law does recognize age as a protected class for employees who are 40 years of age and older. Recently George was fired for being late several times and was caught falsifying his time sheets. In this scenario, although George may qualify as being a person belonging to a protected class, which in this case would be age, he may not be able to prove he was a victim of age discrimination. In George's case, his employer may be able to claim that he was fired because of George's tardiness and fraudulent acts. The adverse treatment needs to be based on the employee belonging to a protected class or bearing a protected characteristic whereas here, George was not exactly Employee of the Month material. George's termination would need to show that it was based on his age. So if George had been told by his boss "hey, you're getting too old for this job" and then thereafter he was terminated, that may be considered as age discrimination.

Discrimination in its application is handled by an Employment Lawyer who represents employees against their employers. In order to even know if you or someone you know has been discriminated against, you should contact an Employment Lawyer in your area.

Harassment in the workplace can come in the form of teasing, name-calling, talking down to an employee, mocking, berating, or bullying. Another form of harassment may be delivered through photos, videos, memes, cartoons, emails, texts, and physical gestures. All of these forms of harassment are categorized as unlawful once the harassment is motivated by the singling out of a protected class. More specifically, if the harassment is based on an employee's sexual orientation, that may be considered as unlawful.


Discrimination and harassment against sexual orientation

Discrimination and/or harassment against an employee'ssexual orientation is considered as unlawful behavior because sexual orientation is considered protected by certain employment laws. Sexual orientation refers to an individual's sexual or romantic preference such as homosexuality, heterosexuality, and bisexuality. If an employee is singled out, treated adversely, or treated less favorable compared to all other employees because of his or her sexual orientation, then that may be discrimination or harassment. An employee who is being discriminated against based on his or her sexual orientation may experience being denied employee benefits, being passed over for promotion, reduced pay, reduced hours, or termination. An applicant may also be subjected to unlawful hiring practices which also prohibited by the employment laws.

The laws in employment law hold employers accountable for discrimination even for perceived sexual orientation harassment and/or discrimination. In other words, an employee who is assumed by their employer or fellow coworkers as being homosexual and is not, yet is teased and harassed based on that assumption, may still be held liable for harassment and/or discrimination.

An Employment Lawyer who has handled cases in the past in sexual orientation discrimination and harassment may know the best way to represent an employee who is in a current discrimination or harassment situation at work.

An employee should not have to endure harassment or discrimination if it is based on a protected class or characteristic, especially if the harassment and/or discrimination is based on an employee's sexual orientation. Employees have the right to feel safe in their work environment and employers are responsible for enforcing an anti-discrimination policy at the workplace. The current employment laws are in place to provide protection for employees and they will be enforced if an Employment Lawyer is hired by an employee who is being victimized at work.

What are my employment rights if I am or become pregnant?


Image result

What are my employment rights if I am or become pregnant?
As society continues to advance, Americans are living longer, maintaining their careers, and deciding to have children a little later in life. Most adults today want it all and employment laws, especially in California, reflect their support of this current trend. In California, there are laws that provide protection and rights for employees who become pregnant, are presently pregnant, or suffer from pregnancy-related medical conditions both physical and/or mental. The laws can be complicated, however, so it is essential for employees to know their basic rights when it comes to pregnancy and to also seek legal counsel. A Work Lawyer would be helpful in the application of these employee rights to the employee's particular situation. An employee should have the freedom to have a child or plan to have a child without worrying whether it will place their career in jeopardy. Although an employee should reach out to a Work Lawyer for pregnancy-related work issues, the following information may be important to keep in mind.
.
The amount of employees at your workplace is an important factor
The number of employees employed at a pregnant employee's work (try saying that five times and fast) is an important factor in determining what rights a pregnant employee has. Speaking of five, employees who are pregnant, become pregnant, or were pregnant, may be entitled to certain rights if their workplace has at least five employees. An employer is obligated to provide the employee with a leave of absence and or justifiable accommodation. So, although it may appear to be out of the ordinary, the rule usually is that an employee who is pregnant, given birth, or experienced a miscarriage may be entitled to certain employee rights but there does need to be at least five employees employed at the particular employee's workplace in order to be entitled to those rights.
Keep in mind that an employee who is or was pregnant is also entitled to these protections if the employee has a miscarriage and/or any physical or mental health issues that may arise out of a childbirth or misarrange. A work attorney is the type of legal professional who could clarify any questions or concerns an employee has regarding their rights according to the laws that concern employees and pregnancy-related occurrences.
.
Your employer may be required to provide you with a four-month leave
There are certain types of employers who are required to comply with particular laws regarding pregnancy leave for their employees. If an employer is required to comply with these laws, then technically the employee must provide the employee with up to four months of leave. Ultimately, the employee's doctor should provide in writing his or her recommendation for how long the employee will need off from work, but again the employer may be required to provide the employee up to 4 months.
If the employer or organization has a policy that provides more than four months leave, the employer may be held accountable for actually providing that extended amount of time if and when an employee needs to take a leave regarding pregnancy, otherwise, this may result in a breach of contract claim.
.
There is such a thing as pregnancy being protected in the workplace
Employees who are pregnant or have a medical condition are both considered protected by the law. Even though pregnancy and medical conditions are two separate but recognized classes/characteristics that are protected by the law, one may accompany the other. In other words, an employee may have a pregnancy-related injury, illness, or condition. Now, what does it mean pregnancy and medical conditions are protected? It means that according to certain employment laws, employees who fall into either or both categories are protected in certain ways in the workplace. Pregnant employees, employees with a medical condition, or employees with a pregnancy-related condition may be entitled to job security, meaning they may have their position reinstated to them upon their return from taking a leave due to their condition. Also, protection means that the law prohibits an employer from treating an employee adversely because of the of the employee's condition. It is against the law for the employer to demote, reduce pay, deduct work hours, deny employee benefits, and/or tease or make inappropriate comments regarding an employee's condition. Should an employer conduct themselves in such a manner is considered discriminatory behavior.
Discriminatory behavior comes in many forms, therefore, an employee who feels they are being treated negatively, based on their condition, they should contact a Work Lawyer to discuss what rights they are entitled to and determine whether those rights were violated.
.
There are many laws that are triggered once an employee becomes pregnant
Depending on the particular facts of a case, there are many different laws that regulate the rights of employees and employers when an employed individual becomes pregnant.
If an employee is discriminated against for being pregnant or is discriminated against for taking a medical leave for their pregnancy, discrimination laws are prompted. There are state laws and federal laws that pertain to discrimination in the workplace. The state laws in California are similar to the federal law, however, depending on the employee's particular circumstances, an employee may find that the state laws are more beneficial to their case. Of course, this is something that a Work Lawyer should be able to determine.
When it comes to an employee needing to take a leave due to pregnancy disability, meaning the employee is diagnosed with a condition or injury that is related to their pregnancy, there are certain laws within the state that are then engaged.

.
Pregnancy leave, pregnancy-related injuries, and/or pregnancy discrimination are all complex legal issues that a Work Lawyer would need to help an employee with. If an employee has made a formal complaint regarding any of the mentioned issues and no steps have been taken by the employer to remedy the problem, then the employee should contact a Work Lawyer. A Work Lawyer may be able to sift through the laws to determine what rights a particular employee has and whether or not that employee should pursue a case against their employer.